If you feel intimidated or unsure when you review color image proofs, you’re not alone.
Many designers fear that they will have to give the color operator or print rep technical correction instructions like, “Take the magenta down 3 points overall.”
Even if you are confident that your technical instructions would be correct, there’s a good reason not to give them: If you tell a color specialist exactly what to do, he or she may do only that. There’s also more than one way to get to the intended result, and your instructions may cause unintended shifts to other areas of the image that an alternate approach would not.
So be articulate, but not a know-it-all. Your real job here is job is to describe—in garden-variety English—what you are seeing on the proof and what you want to be seeing. This helps the color specialist focus on the results you want. Leave it to him or her to determine the best way to achieve those results.
Do say this
Note this pattern in the examples below: “I see this. I want to see that.” Be sure to specify whether the comment refers to one section of the image or the image overall:
- This face looks too grey. I’d like it to look pinker.
- The Asian man’s face has an orange cast. It needs to look more pink, with an olive undertone.
- Detail is disappearing in the shadows. Capture more detail.
- There is less contrast than I want overall. Increase the contrast.
- Left arm looks fuzzy. Can it be sharpened?
- There’s a funny halo around this building. Eliminate halo.
- That man’s eye bags look really dark. Subdue them.
- The image looks light. I would like it to be more bright and saturated overall.
- Image looks flat overall. I’d like to see more shape.
- Neutrals have a blue cast in this corner. I’d like them to look more neutral.
- Lawn in the foreground has a blue cast. I’d like it to be more of a bright kelly green.
- This image looks dull overall. I would like it to pop more. (Yes, this is a very common instruction!)
Don’t say that
It’s true that these comments are subjective, but they are also descriptive. Do be mindful of what you say and how you say it, though. I once said I wanted a red to look “more brick,” and didn’t live it down until the guys had razzed me mercilessly. “Would that be new brick or antique? Sandstone or clinker? Haw haw haw!”
If you have a specific color in mind to be matched, provide a visual example. A brick is too awkward to carry, so bring a Pantone chip or laser print instead.
Beware of thinking in color wheel terms and calling images “too cool” or “too warm.” In the color correcting world, a cool image is too cyan, not too green or blue-green. A warm image is too yellow, not too red-orange or red. It follows that to “warm up” an image means to add yellow; to “cool down” an image means to add cyan.
Designers sometimes inadvertently give conflicting instructions: “Increase contrast and saturation overall.” When contrast is increased, detail in shadow areas can be lost and saturation in the highlights decreases. When saturation is increased, contrast decreases. What do you want most?
Shift Your Focus and take one more look
It’s important to step back and shift your perception, then look at the proofs one more time.
One trick is to squint through your eyelashes to focus on light and dark values. (Strong highlights will look more dominant on press than they appear on the proof.)
Finally, look closely at every square inch of the image again, not just at the focal point. This is when you’ll notice the image disasters that tend to slip by.
Here are just a few of the slipp-ees designers and I have caught in the past—and some we haven’t. These things are easy to miss when you’re reviewing. But if you do miss something, believe me, it’s the only thing you’ll see on the printed product!
- Grimy fingernails on the cover image above
- A tree looks like it’s growing out of the top of the model’s head
- A reflection from a light switch is the brightest thing on the page
- The backwards-reading number 47 on a football jersey in a flopped image
- A competitor’s logo on the laptop everyone is gathered around
- A way-happy trouser bulge and shadow in a men’s suits postcard
- “NORDSTOM” (with just one R) knocked out of the photo on a full-page newspaper ad
- The nude girlie calendar on the dorm room wall right behind the wholesome Catholic college freshman (This one was caught by the pre-press specialist!)
Granted, many of these problems should have been eliminated by the stylist or art director at the photoshoot. But if they weren’t, your eagle eye provides the last chance for a fix.
If you’re a PhotoShop pro
If you are an advanced PhotoShop user who makes many adjustments to image files, be sure to give the vendor both your corrected file and your original file. And leave CMYK conversion to the pre-press operator to do as the last step. Corrected or converted files that have been opened and closed several times can lose significant amounts of the data the operator will need in order to do any further rounds of adjustments to the images.
Disaster Avoidance Tip
Whenever possible, discuss your color comments with the vendor in person. An experienced rep will listen to your comments, point out things you may have missed seeing, mark up the proofs as you talk, and then take them back to the plant and go over the instructions with the color operator.
I avoid skipping this step unless I know the vendor very well and am sure that their color operator will interpret my comments accurately. Otherwise, I’m likely to have to order an extra round of proofs and spend more money to get the color right.
© 2010 Nani Paape


14 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 4, 2009 at 6:32 am
Mike Davis
I still smile when I remember years ago the time the client asked the designer to change the project’s headline typeface to something more “breakfasty”.
Yes! When detailing any revisions, well-worded descriptions (like your examples) are key to getting what you want.
It is good to remember that an enhancement in one area may come at the expense of something else. Someone has to make the decision as to what gets sacrificed. It can help to add comments like “it’s OK for shadows to go darker or lose detail” if you feel that better detail in lighter areas is most important. That may have been the reason someone didn’t “go there” in the first place.
I applaud all those people who appreciate the value of hard proofs, as opposed to those who ask for revisions based only on what they see on their computer display of the image files. “Brighten overall. Too sharp!” Even the best Photoshop folks see issues on the hard proof that were not apparent even on their accurately profiled & calibrated displays, using soft-proofing. They quickly and quietly revise & re-run that proof which no one will ever see.
Mike Davis
Colorprep.us
October 4, 2009 at 1:06 pm
naniprints
Hi Mike, Thanks for visiting my blog, and thank you for your comments. You add a very good point about the trade-offs that certain requests might entail—another good reason for proof review to be a back-and-forth conversation.
I encountered this very problem when working on a global corporation’s annual report from Seattle with an east coast printer. On the next round of proofs we saw that a few of the changes we had requested had shifted other things in the image that we didn’t want to.
Yes, hard proofs are still very valuable to me. Soft proofing can be useful for some things. “Color management” and soft proofing are touted as the next big thing, but I have yet to experience paper-free color management that works seamlessly in my world of changing press and monitor profiles and uncontrolled ambient light conditions.
One of my vendors often reports that his pre-press folks (some Seattle’s best) have made an “internal” proof for my project, seen the need for new adjustments, and gone back to the drawing board before showing me another proof.
PS A breakfasty typeface? Now THAT’S funny!
October 4, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Twitter Trackbacks for How to review color image proofs « Printing Disasters [naniprints.wordpress.com] on Topsy.com
[...] How to review color image proofs « Printing Disasters naniprints.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/how-to-review-color-image-proofs – view page – cached and How to Avoid Them — From the page [...]
October 6, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Jamie Bradley
One of the tips I’ve given my clients in the past is to create a “proof page” file of images they have specific color concerns over. It’s a cost-effective way to check out trouble spots and get them corrected in advance, rather than when a full set of proofs has been shown and press time is scheduled for the next morning to meet a looming mailing or event date.
Just pick the images you are concerned about, place them on an 11×17 page and have the printer run the proof. This is also a good time to “editorialize” the color – meaning that you provide input to prepress about how you want the color to look in your FIRST round of proofs.
Investing in this step helps you save money and time, and gets you better results in the final printed piece. Just make sure you use someone skilled enough to ask the right questions (like Nani!).
Jamie Bradley
Sophwell
October 6, 2009 at 1:10 pm
naniprints
Hi Jamie, That’s a great idea. If I’m part of a project, I like to coordinate an “image release discussion” between the rep and the designer, where the designer gives input on the direction he’d like to see the images move. For example, if he or she likes a particular pale green cast in one image, it can be used to map the other images to so that they will family together well.
I know that ganged or loose color is sometimes considered an unnecessary step now, but a ganged proof can be used, as you say, to save money in the long run and delays in the schedule. BTW, it’s rare that the designers I work with have an image they don’t have concerns about!
There are so many aspects to the “dance of color” that I’m writing another post on it, to be published at the end of the week. Thanks as always for your comments—and the Nani pitch!
Boston area readers, take a look at Sophwell.com. Touche, Jamie!
October 9, 2009 at 12:10 am
Ryan
I don’t think it’s the case that warmer is always yellow. I work at a printing company and generally associated warmer with magenta. I just asked a couple of prepress guys and they said it could be either, depending on the image. That’s probably why I associated it with magenta, b/c usually clients ask for a warmer image on skin tones so you would use magenta there and not yellow.
So just be careful about those types of generalizations.
October 9, 2009 at 8:50 am
naniprints
Hi Ryan, Thanks for visiting my blog and thank you for your comments. I appreciate your research and the point that “warmer” could indeed mean + M. That’s one more good reason to explain what result you’re looking for, like “a redder face” when “warmer” could be interpreted differently by different operators. The color house that trained me in color viewing, and other old-time print reps, have concurred with the + Y. I’ll be interested in what other readers have heard, too!
October 12, 2009 at 8:20 pm
BonoLux Chris
True story about failure in color communication:
I was advising an online photo lab client on issues with their newly purchased scanners when their lab manager/photographer/evangelist calls me up with a scanner problem. “The color looks weird”. Hmmm I replied, what do you mean by weird? Is it too contrasty, too flat? Undersaturated? Oversaturated? The wrong hue?
“I don’t know, it’s just weird”
That was pretty much all of the invitation I needed to have some fun. “Okay, go to the setup menu, go to the color tab, and reduce ‘Color Weirdness’ to minus three.”
“Ummmmm…. I don’t see a setting for weirdness”
You don’t say.
After grilling him for another five minutes or so, I determined that what he was talking about was an overall color cast to the images.
“Great, what color are you scans”
“Ummmm… I would say…. they look….seafoam”
After picking up the phone, I replied “Gary, pretend I only know six colors, and they are red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, and yellow. If you want to describe this color, pick at most two of those…”
Armed with this information, I could actually do something about the problem.
I really like the approach above – describe what you see, describe what you want. Although you don’t have to give numbers or percentages, I would recommend using some basic terminology that is easy for everyone to understand: lighter/darker, contrastier/flatter, more/less saturated, more/less sharp, and the six primaries. Realize that red leans more to the orange side than your box of Crayolas tell you it should be. Realize that blue leans more toward the purple side. I use warmer/colder all of the time, but I probably shouldn’t.
Using these basic terms helps develop a common framework for understanding what you see and want to see, and avoids any awkward weird seafoam moments.
October 12, 2009 at 10:19 pm
naniprints
Hi Chris, What a great story! Your advice about basic terminology is really useful, too. Thanks for visiting my blog and weighing in!