If you have Cautionary Tales to tell about metallic inks, you’re not alone. They’re a different animal than most other offset inks and they present unique technical challenges. This article explains some of the characteristics of metallic inks and offers tips for working with them successfully.
Two Cautionary Tales
One designer told me about a brochure project he’d designed that included metallic silver ink. Of course the client was in a big hurry to get the printed brochures, he said. The printer did not think to protect the ink with a coating, did not allow enough drying time, and crammed the brochures tightly into a carton for delivery. Each brochure offset or transferred silver ink from one brochure onto the next. Yikes!
Another designer friend described trying to print black 8 pt. Helvetica Light type on a silver map that included several screen tint values. He commented that it was impossible to tell from the digital proof whether the black type was overprinting or knocking out of the silver, but it looked fine on the proof.
It turned out that the black was set to overprint, so on press it showed up in several values of silverish-black. The designer reported solving the problem by switching the map art from metallic silver to PMS 429 gray.
Metallic ink characteristics
Most offset printing inks are translucent. But metallic inks are opaque, or nearly so. That’s because metallic inks contain itty bitty flecks of genuine metal. This opacity can work in your favor when you want to lay down a large metallic solid—you can often get good results with one hit. Opaque metallic inks can also be printed on dark papers. (More about that later.)
As metallic ink dries/cures, the metal flakes rise to the surface of the ink layer, making it look more shiny. If you don’t like the way the ink looks at press, refer to the drawdown as a more accurate guide than the wet ink. Then be patient, it’s going to look more shiny tomorrow!
To trap or overprint, that is the question
Trapping metallics with non-metalic inks is tricky because the metallic ink trap sometimes looks “haloed” against the regular ink or forms a slight ridge. Experienced printers get around this by setting a skinnier width of trap line. This approach is not feasible on small or thin type.
As noted in the Cautionary Tale above, overprinting on a field of metallic ink can also be problematic (though I’ve seen it done well), because you can see the opaque metallic through the overprinted translucent ink. Even black can look muddy.
When type is small and fine, overprinting is the only option. One printer I work with suggests using a lighter screen of the metallic instead of 100%, then overprinting the flat color. This has worked well for me.
Another solution is to use Pantone Black 7 for a more opaque black. It has PMS 877 silver in the mix. Black 7 tends to read as a dark charcoal rather than black.
Reflectance and Screen Tints
The metal flakes also change how the light reflects off the printed sheet, causing enough interference that screen tints often read differently than expected, usually darker, but not always. Many designers really like 90% screen tints, but a 90% metallic may read very close to 100%!
Sometimes the right adjustment to the screen tint is counterintuitive. In general, though, avoid the extremes of a 10% or 90% tint or the subtlety of 5- and 10% steps. 15- to 20% steps (like 15%, 30% and 50%) are more likely to give reliable, perceptible contrast between tints. In short, subtlety can be difficult to achieve with metallic inks.
Metallic ink projects are good candidates for stochastic screening, in my experience, especially if you want to overprint tints of silver. This sidesteps moiré issues.
Paper Choice Matters

Annual report printed on coated dull stock
But designers like subtlety! I’ve seen them disappointed with how non-metallic the metallic inks turned out on uncoated papers. If you use metallic ink + uncoated paper, be prepared for subtle results. Maybe too subtle. I feel that using metallic on uncoated is a bit of a waste. Silver is likely to look gray. Gold or copper may look blah brown.
The reason the metallic looks so flat has to do with the way light strikes and bounces off the rougher surface of uncoated paper—that shine is diffused rather than bounced directly back toward your eyes.
If you are aiming for maximum shine, print on a coated stock—the glossier the better. Coated stocks have more ink holdout, which means that less of the ink is absorbed into the paper fibers. It sits atop the paper instead, where it can work up some serious shine. Gloss coated stocks are highly reflective to begin with, so they’ll add the “light bounce” back to the eye that will enhance a shiny read.

Dull stock yields softer shine
Next best is dull stock. Matte stock is closest to the diffuse surface of uncoated stock, so it will have the least shiny read of the coated stocks.
Metallic Inks on Dark Backgrounds
The best approach to printing metallic inks on dark paper will depend on how dark the background is. For the highest contrast and the most pop on very dark paper (such as chocolate brown, dark blue, or black), the printer may suggest laying down a first hit of opaque white under the metallic ink. This solution requires the printer to hold very accurate registration of the metallic to the white ink, because if the white is choked in very much, that undesirable halo effect may occur.
Speaking of Body Copy
Blocks of type printed in metallic ink, especially silver, can be very hard to read. When a designer insists on silver type, I recommend adding a tiny bit of black to the ink formula to improve readability. Otherwise, the reader will have to tilt the page to various angles in order to read the type!
Coatings are a Must
Remember those itty bitty metal flakes? Well, they won’t all stay stuck to the paper, so some kind of sealer or coating a must. Unfortunately, any coating will dull back the metallic sheen to some degree. You’ll need a varnish or aqueous coating for envelope flaps or any medium to large solid. Gloss varnish is best. Satin and dull will subdue more shine. Just about the only time you can get away with not varnishing is for light-coverage body copy.
For uncoated paper, use varnish. For coated paper, use varnish or aqueous coating. Be aware that varnish tends to yellow more over time, so it’s more suitable for pieces with a shelf life of less than a year.
In writing this article, I learned something new. Take a look at this metallic page from my oldest Pantone fan. Boy, was I surprised to see that every color except silver had tarnished so severely! I don’t know whether this fan page was varnished or not, but I’ll bet that varnishing also guards against tarnish.
Disaster Avoidance Tips
- Not every printer has experience with metallic inks. Before you award a metallic job to a printer, ask to see samples of metallic ink projects his shop has produced. Look for trapping halos, clean screens that are not plugged, and clean-looking solids and screens. Discuss how they handled traps and ask about any other challenges the jobs presented.
- If you have a specific look in mind, provide examples. Duotones with metallic + black can be gorgeous. Give the printer a visual guide.
- Digital proofs do not simulate the look of metallic inks well at all, so always order ink drawdowns, one half of the paper covered with the selected coating and one half without any coating, so you can see the effect of the coating on the shine level. The drawdowns will be your most reliable visual gauge.
- Show your design to the printer early in the process. If either of you are concerned about how the metallic colors will read, it may be worth negotiating a small press test—the gold standard (ahem!) insurance policy for getting the look you want.
What’s your experience with metallic inks? If you have more tips for printing with them successfully, please share them in the comments.
© 2010 Nani Paape



14 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 7, 2009 at 6:51 am
Bruce Colthart Creative (@bccreative)
Nice post Nani; and helpful. Though I’ve not had clients interested in metallics in many years, I love them – especially on an uncoated, where I knew that they’d be low-luster. Sometimes that’s all that was needed to make the color memorable, that little bit of sheen on a premium stock. Used it successfully on stationery (with the metallic near the edges, with no chance of getting toner on it at the copy shop). On a dull coated stock, a spot gloss varnish makes it really jump off the page while also protecting it (nothing like smudged fingerprints on a heavy hit of soft, unprotected metallic!)
December 7, 2009 at 10:44 am
naniprints
Hi Bruce, I like your description of metallic ink on uncoated as “low-luster” and pointing out that there will indeed be some sheen.
Good point about fingerprinting, too. If you’ve got the units and budget, a spot gloss varnish for the metallic and a dull varnish everyplace else makes for pages that don’t smudge, but metallic that really pops.
Dull stock not only fingerprints, it also scuffs easily, so protecting its surface is a good idea, especially on an outside cover so it will go through bindery with less damage. When selecting paper, I like to run a fingernail across the dull sheetd to compare how much the brands being considered scuff. (It varies.) Cheers, ~Nani
December 7, 2009 at 10:48 am
naniprints
PS: Dear Readers,
I wrote this post on metallic inks at the suggestion of the designer who told me the Cautionary Tale about the metallic map/overprinting problem. I’d be happy to receive other topic ideas. If you have one in mind, please drop me a line via the Contact Me page or by leaving a comment! ~Nani
February 16, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Keith Saidler
We have used metalic inks in many projects and have had good results. It is important that you get a good printer. We are now going through a problem with a printer concerning the correct color for our metallic silver. We have had these product brochures over 6 times with 3 different printers. We decided to use a different printer who has done basic 4 color work for us. It was a bone to them because of some quick turn times. What a mistake. THe metallic turned out 2 times darker then all the other pieces. There was some color variation in the earlier pieces but not that great. They said they did everything right and have the correct color. We are in a stalemate.
February 16, 2010 at 2:24 pm
naniprints
How frustrating, Keith! Did you approve an ink drawdown before the job went on press? If so, you can point to the signed drawdown, which is your contract color for the job.
Also, if you provided a previous sample for them to match and specified “match sample” in your specifications, you have two strong legs to stand on to insist on a discount, a re-do, or to reject the job entirely. Most printers will want to make the job right for you, but if they are in over their heads, you may have no recourse but to reject the job.
Your Printing Disaster reinforces how important it is to see printed samples ahead of time that demonstrate that the printer can indeed do the job. I went around in circles with one printer who wanted my firm’s business, but refused to show us printed samples on uncoated papers. Once I finally DID see some of their uncoated samples (years later, BTW), I saw why they didn’t show them off. All of their samples were dark and muddy, demonstrating that they did not know how to adjust their press curves for optimum printing on uncoated papers! ~Nani
March 29, 2010 at 9:12 pm
Thomas Krul
Excellent article – it’s years’ worth of experience and potential trial and error in one lump sum for all to learn from. I did quite a few metallic projects back 8-10 years ago but hardly since. Now one of my clients is interested in metallics on a package design and I need a refresh. Your post is one of the only really useful bits of information I could find and reading it reminded me of all of the hands-on effort required to get what you have in your mind’s eye come out correctly (i.e. overprinting complexly masked metallic on top of 4 color images with tons of knockouts and traps) and the rules you MUST apply if you wish to get a decent result.
The idea on this job is to impart the package design with a little sparkle as it’s an insert in a clamshell for a consumer electronics product – however the printer is located a few thousand miles away,I’ve never worked with them before and they’re treating it basically as a 5th color… so unless I use the metallic sparingly or on pure, trapped font treatment or embellishment, I think we may unfortunately have to drop it (loving metallics is also knowing when to say “no”).
A metallic foil background might be a better bet, but the printer in question hasn’t done metallic foil before.
Again, thanks for the great article!
March 29, 2010 at 10:28 pm
naniprints
Hi Thomas, Wow, thanks for the high praise! I love how complex metallics are, and you’re right, I learned something new on each new job. For your hint-of-sparkle package, one thing you might consider is to do a varnish tinted with metallic ink, probably 10% or less. That would impart sheen. That way it’s a solid, not a screen, so it avoids moire issues.
Alternately, if you wanted to overprint a light screen of silver ink, stochastic screening would be good.
But with the tinted V, you’d have the predictability of seeing drawdowns. Have them made on top of makeready with 4-CP images on it! You could also test to see what it would look like with a Satin V versus a Dull V, which would have less sheen. This would be more predictable than foil, which would make me pretty nervous at that distance, especially if it was a large area, which can have adhering problems, in my experience, unless you have a huge foiling letterpress at your disposal.
If the printing is going on the inside of a package, is it going on the uncoated side of a C-1-S board? If so, you won’t get much sparkle on the uncoated anyway, in which case you may as well use a pale gray PMS!
Now I’m curious to hear what you decide on and how it works out for you. I hope you’ll come back to the blog and tell us! Good luck on the project, ~Nani
May 4, 2010 at 7:05 am
Sarah Robertson
I’ve been researching printing with metallics for the last few weeks and this article has come up time and time again, so I thought it was time I commented and asked for a little direction!
I’m working on a job where we were hoping to print metallic gold (877) type against a royal purple background. The type is fairly small, between 6-8pt depending on the items, and looks as though it’s fading away into the gold on the proofs we got back today.
The printer is encouraging us to change the type to white now, which whilst I agree it would be easier, I’m keen to get the job right.
Another option would be gold foiling, but I think it would be a shame to overlook the metallic in favour of foiling or the white if there’s a way we can do this successfully.
Any tips?
May 4, 2010 at 9:45 am
naniprints
Hi Sarah, Thanks for your question.
CMYK digital proofs can’t represent metallic accurately, so the real thing might turn out better than you expect. You might consider going for a paler gold to get more contrast against the background. That type size is very small, too. You might consider going to a bolder weight and slightly bigger size. I suspect from what you describe that your biggest issue is that the value or weight of the two colors is too close. That would be the culprit in making them disappear. Comparing your ink drawdowns side-by-side can tell you if this is true.
One other approach would be to use 2 varnishes, a dull one for the background and a gloss for the metallic, which would further enhance the contrast between the metallic and flat color.
Isn’t 877 silver, not gold? Going to silver metallic would be another option to get more contrast, as would going to foil. Foil stamping can capture amazingly fine detail, in my experience, but the small type would still be a challenge. Perhaps your printer could show you examples?
Best of luck to you on the project! Stop back by and let us know what you settled on as a solution and how it worked out for you. The next person who finds this article via search engine may be looking for the same answer! ~Nani
May 4, 2010 at 10:00 am
Sarah Robertson
Thanks for the speedy response!
It is 871 gold – my bad! Too close to metallic jobs at the moment. We’ve incorporated spot silver into our own print design. That, fortunately, should come out really well as it covers a large area and isn’t quite as challenging as my new conquest
Appreciate that the digital proof won’t be accurate, but it was super dull, so I may suggest the double varnish route. It sounds like it could work well with the company’s brand image, which I think is really important when it comes to print. We’ve come across a lot of jobs where the finishing is overdone and doesn’t tie in with the simplicity of some brands, so I’m keen to stay focused on their overall identity and not produce something that’s too in your face.
I’ll keep you posted and thanks again for your response.
Sarah